Pain

Pain
Injured Bystrov.JPG
ICD-10 R52
ICD-9 338
DiseasesDB 9503
MedlinePlus 002164
MeSH D010146

Pain is an unpleasant sensory and emotional experience associated with actual or potential tissue damage, or described in terms of such damage.[1] It is the feeling common to such experiences as stubbing a toe, burning a finger, putting iodine on a cut, and bumping the "funny bone".[2]

Pain motivates us to withdraw from potentially damaging situations, protect a damaged body part while it heals, and avoid those situations in the future.[3] It is initiated by stimulation of nociceptors in the peripheral nervous system, or by damage to or malfunction of the peripheral or central nervous systems.[4]

Most pain resolves promptly once the painful stimulus is removed and the body has healed, but sometimes pain persists despite removal of the stimulus and apparent healing of the body; and sometimes pain arises in the absence of any detectable stimulus, damage or pathology.[5]

Pain is the most common reason for physician consultation in the United States.[6] It is a major symptom in many medical conditions, and can significantly interfere with a person's quality of life and general functioning.[7] Social support, hypnotic suggestion, excitement in sport or war, distraction, and appraisal can all significantly modulate pain's intensity or unpleasantness.[8][9]

Etymology : "Pain (n.) 1297, "punishment," especially for a crime; also (c.1300) "condition one feels when hurt, opposite of pleasure," from Old French peine, in turn from Latin poena, "punishment, penalty"[10] (in L.L. also "torment, hardship, suffering") and that from Greek "ποινή" (poine), generally "price paid", "penalty", "punishment"[11], from PIE *kwei- "to pay, atone, compensate" (...)."

Online Etymology Dictionary

Contents

Classification

The International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP) classification system recommends describing pain according to five categories: duration and severity, anatomical location, body system involved, cause, and temporal characteristics (intermittent, constant, etc.).[12] This system has been criticized by Woolf and others as inadequate for guiding research and treatment,[13] and an additional category based on neurochemical mechanism has been proposed.[14]

Duration

Pain is usually transitory, lasting only until the noxious stimulus is removed or the underlying damage or pathology has healed, but some painful conditions, such as rheumatoid arthritis, peripheral neuropathy, cancer and idiopathic pain, may persist for years. Pain that lasts a long time is called chronic, and pain that resolves quickly is called acute. Traditionally, the distinction between acute and chronic pain has relied upon an arbitrary interval of time from onset; the two most commonly used markers being 3 months and 6 months since the onset of pain,[14] though some theorists and researchers have placed the transition from acute to chronic pain at 12 months.[15] Others apply acute to pain that lasts less than 30 days, chronic to pain of more than six months duration, and subacute to pain that lasts from one to six months.[16] A popular alternative definition of chronic pain, involving no arbitrarily fixed durations is "pain that extends beyond the expected period of healing."[14] Chronic pain may be divided into "cancer" and "benign".[16]

Region and system

Pain can be classed according to its location in the body, as in headache, low back pain and pelvic pain; or according to the body system involved, i.e., myofascial pain (emanating from skeletal muscles or the fibrous sheath surrounding them), rheumatic (emanating from the joints and surrounding tissue), causalgia ("burning" pain in the skin of the arms or, sometimes, legs; thought to be the product of peripheral nerve damage), neuropathic pain (caused by damage to or malfunction of any part of the nervous system), or vascular (pain from blood vessels).[14]

Cause

The crudest example of classification by cause simply distinguishes "somatogenic" pain (arising from a perturbation of the body) from "psychogenic" pain (arising from a perturbation of the mind: when a thorough physical exam, imaging, and laboratory tests fail to detect the cause of pain, it is assumed to be the product of psychic conflict or psychopathology).[14] Somatogenic pain is divided into "nociceptive" (caused by activation of nociceptors) and "neuropathic" (caused by damage to or malfunction of the nervous system).[17]

Nociceptive

Nociceptive pain is initiated by stimulation of nociceptors, and may be classified according to the mode of noxious stimulation; the most common categories being "thermal" (heat or cold), "mechanical" (crushing, tearing, etc.) and "chemical" (iodine in a cut, chili powder in the eyes).

Nociceptive pain may also be divided into "superficial somatic" and "deep", and deep pain into "deep somatic" and "visceral". Superficial somatic pain is initiated by activation of nociceptors in the skin or superficial tissues, and is sharp, well-defined and clearly located. Examples of injuries that produce superficial somatic pain include minor wounds and minor (first degree) burns. Deep somatic pain is initiated by stimulation of nociceptors in ligaments, tendons, bones, blood vessels, fasciae and muscles, and is dull, aching, poorly-localized pain; examples include sprains and broken bones. Visceral pain originates in the viscera (organs) and often is extremely difficult to locate, and several visceral regions produce "referred" pain when injured, where the sensation is located in an area distant from the site of injury or pathology.[18]

Neuropathic

Neuropathic pain is caused by damage to or malfunction of the nervous system, and is divided into "peripheral" (originating in the peripheral nervous system) and "central" (originating in the brain or spinal cord).[19] Peripheral neuropathic pain is often described as “burning,” “tingling,” “electrical,” “stabbing,” or “pins and needles.” [20] Bumping the "funny bone" elicits peripheral neuropathic pain.

Psychogenic

Psychogenic pain, also called psychalgia or somatoform pain, is pain caused, increased, or prolonged by mental, emotional, or behavioral factors.[21][22] Headache, back pain, and stomach pain are sometimes diagnosed as psychogenic.[21] Sufferers are often stigmatized, because both medical professionals and the general public tend to think that pain from a psychological source is not "real". However, specialists consider that it is no less actual or hurtful than pain from any other source.[23]

People with long term pain frequently display psychological disturbance, with elevated scores on the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory scales of hysteria, depression and hypochondriasis (the "neurotic triad"). Some investigators have argued that it is this neuroticism that causes acute injuries to turn chronic, but clinical evidence points the other way, to chronic pain causing neuroticism. When long term pain is relieved by therapeutic intervention, scores on the neurotic triad and anxiety fall, often to normal levels. Self-esteem, often low in chronic pain patients, also shows striking improvement once pain has resolved.[24]

“The term 'psychogenic' assumes that medical diagnosis is so perfect that all organic causes of pain can be detected; regrettably, we are far from such infallability... All too often, the diagnosis of neurosis as the cause of pain hides our ignorance of many aspects of pain medicine.” Ronald Melzack, 1996.[24]

Phantom pain

Phantom pain is pain from a part of the body that has been lost or from which the brain no longer receives physical signals. It is a type of neuropathic pain. Phantom limb pain is a common experience of amputees. One study found that eight days after amputation, 72 per cent of patients had phantom limb pain, and six months later, 65 percent reported it.[25] Some experience continuous pain that varies in intensity or quality; others experience several bouts a day, or it may occur only once every week or two. It is described as shooting, crushing, burning or cramping. If the pain is continuous for a long period, parts of the intact body may become sensitized, so that touching them evokes pain in the phantom limb, or phantom limb pain may accompany urination or defecation.[26]

Local anesthetic injections into the nerves or sensitive areas of the stump may relieve pain for days, weeks or, sometimes permanently, despite the drug wearing off in a matter of hours; and small injections of hypertonic saline into the soft tissue between vertebrae produces local pain that radiates into the phantom limb for ten minutes or so and may be followed by hours, weeks or even longer of partial or total relief from phantom pain. Vigorous vibration or electrical stimulation of the stump, or current from electrodes surgically implanted onto the spinal cord all produce relief in some patients.[26]

Paraplegia, the loss of sensation and voluntary motor control after serious spinal cord damage, may be accompanied by root ("girdle") pain at the level of the spinal cord damage, visceral pain evoked by a filling bladder or bowel, or, in five to ten per cent of paraplegics, phantom body pain in areas of complete sensory loss. Phantom body pain is initially described as burning or tingling but may evolve into severe crushing or pinching pain, fire running down the legs, or a knife twisting in the flesh. Onset may be immediate or may not occur until years after the disabling injury. Surgical treatment rarely provides lasting relief.[26]

Pain asymbolia

Pain science acknowledges, in a puzzling challenge to IASP definition,[1] that pain may be experienced as a sensation devoid of any unpleasantness: this happens in a syndrome called pain asymbolia or pain dissociation, caused by conditions like lobotomy, cingulotomy or morphine analgesia. Typically, such patients report that they have pain but are not bothered by it, they recognize the sensation of pain but are mostly or completely immune to suffering from it.[27]

Insensitivity to pain

The ability to experience pain is essential for protection from injury, and recognition of the presence of injury. Episodic analgesia may occur under special circumstances, such as in the excitement of sport or war: a soldier on the battlefield may feel no pain for many hours from a traumatic amputation or other severe injury.[28] However, insensitivity to pain may also be acquired following conditions such as spinal cord injury, diabetes mellitus, or more rarely leprosy.[29] A small number of people suffer from congenital analgesia ("congenital insensitivity to pain"), a genetic defect that puts these individuals at constant risk from the consequences of unrecognized injury or illness. Children with this condition suffer carelessly repeated damage to their tongue, eyes, joints, skin, and muscles. They may attain adulthood, but have a shortened life expectancy.

Effects

Experimental subjects challenged by acute pain and patients in chronic pain experience impairments in attention control, working memory, mental flexibility, problem solving, and information processing speed.[30]

Theory

Specificity

Descartes' pain pathway.

In his 1664 Treatise of Man, René Descartes traced a pain pathway. "Particles of heat" (A) activate a spot of skin (B) attached by a fine thread (cc) to a valve in the brain (de) where this activity opens the valve, allowing the animal spirits to flow from a cavity (F) into the muscles that then flinch from the stimulus, turn the head and eyes toward the affected body part, and move the hand and turn the body protectively. The underlying premise of this model - that pain is the direct product of a noxious stimulus activating a dedicated pain pathway, from a receptor in the skin, along a thread or chain of nerve fibers to the pain center in the brain, to a mechanical behavioral response - remained the dominant perspective on pain until the mid-nineteen sixties.[31]

Pattern

Specificity theory (dedicated pain receptor and pathway) has been challenged by the theory, proposed initially in 1874 by Wilhelm Erb, that a pain signal can be generated by stimulation of any sensory receptor, provided the stimulation is intense enough: the pattern of stimulation (intensity over time and area), not the receptor type, determines whether nociception occurs. Alfred Goldscheider (1894) proposed that over time, activity from many sensory fibers might accumulate in the dorsal horns of the spinal cord and begin to signal pain once a certain threshold of accumulated stimulation has been crossed. In 1953, Willem Noordenbos observed that a signal carried from the area of injury along large diameter "touch, pressure or vibration" fibers may inhibit the signal carried by the thinner "pain" fibers - the ratio of large fiber signal to thin fiber signal determining pain intensity; hence, we rub a smack. This was taken as a demonstration that pattern of stimulation (of large versus thin fibers in this instance) modulates pain intensity.[32]

Gate Control

This all set the scene for Melzack and Wall's classic 1965 Science article "Pain Mechanisms: A New Theory".[33] Here the authors proposed that the large diameter ("touch, pressure, vibration") and thin ("pain") fibers meet at two places in the dorsal horn of the spinal cord: the "transmission" (T) cells, and the "inhibitory" cells. Both large fiber signals and thin fiber signals excite the T cells, and when the output of the T cells exceeds a critical level, pain begins. The job of the inhibitory cells is to inhibit activation of the T cells. The T cells are the gate on pain, and inhibitory cells can shut the gate. If your large diameter and thin fibers have been activated by a noxious event, they will be exciting T cells (opening the pain gate). At the same time, the large diameter fibers will be exciting the inhibitory cells (tending to close the gate), while the thin fibers will be impeding the inhibitory cells (tending to leave the gate open). So, the more large fiber activity relative to thin fiber activity, the less pain you will feel. They had conceived a neural "circuit diagram" to explain why we rub a smack.[31]

The authors then added the most enduring and influential element of their theory: a pain modulating signal coming down from the brain to the dorsal horn. They pictured the large fiber signals traveling, not only from the site of injury to the inhibitory and T cells in the dorsal horn, but also up to the brain where, depending on the state of the brain, they may trigger a signal back down to the dorsal horn to further modulate inhibitory cell activity and so pain intensity. This model provided a neuroscientific rationale for taking seriously the effect of motivation and cognition on pain intensity.[31]

Dimensions

In 1968 Melzack and Casey described pain in terms of its three dimensions: "Sensory-discriminative" (sense of the intensity, location, quality and duration of the pain), "Affective-motivational" (unpleasantness and urge to escape the unpleasantness), and "Cognitive-evaluative" (cognitions such as appraisal, cultural values, distraction and hypnotic suggestion).[9] They theorized that pain intensity (the sensory discriminative dimension) and unpleasantness (the affective-motivational dimension) are not simply determined by the magnitude of the painful stimulus, but “higher” cognitive activities (the cognitive-evaluative dimension) can influence perceived intensity and unpleasantness. Cognitive activities "may affect both sensory and affective experience or they may modify primarily the affective-motivational dimension. Thus, excitement in games or war appears to block both dimensions of pain, while suggestion and placebos may modulate the affective-motivational dimension and leave the sensory-discriminative dimension relatively undisturbed." (p. 432) The paper ended with a call to action: "Pain can be treated not only by trying to cut down the sensory input by anesthetic block, surgical intervention and the like, but also by influencing the motivational-affective and cognitive factors as well." (p. 435)

Theory today

Regions of the cerebral cortex associated with pain.

Specificity, the theory that pain is transmitted from specific pain receptors along dedicated pain fibers to a pain center in the brain, has withstood the challenge from pattern theory, though the "pain center" in the brain has become an elaborate neural network. Wilhelm Erb's (1874) early pattern theory hypothesis, that a pain signal can be generated by intense enough stimulation of any sensory receptor, has been soundly disproved.[34] A-delta and C peripheral nerve fibers carry information regarding the state of the body to the dorsal horn of the spinal cord.[35] Some of these A-delta and C fibers, nociceptors, respond only to painfully intense stimuli, while others do not differentiate noxious from non-noxious stimuli.[34] A.D.Craig and colleagues have identified fibers dedicated to carrying A-delta fiber pain signals, and others dedicated to carrying C fiber pain signals up the spinal cord to the thalamus in the brain.[36] There is a specific pain pathway from nociceptor to brain. Pain-related activity in the thalamus spreads to the insular cortex (thought to embody, among other things, the feeling that distinguishes pain from other homeostatic emotions such as itch and nausea) and anterior cingulate cortex (thought to embody, among other things, the motivational element of pain);[35] and pain that is distinctly located also activates the primary and secondary somatosensory cortices.[37][38]

The gate control theory has not fared well. Most of the dorsal horn interneurons identified by Melzack and Wall as inhibitory are in fact excitatory,[34] and Koji Inui and colleagues have recently shown that pain reduction due to non-noxious touch or vibration can result from activity within the cerebral cortex, with minimal contribution at the spinal level.[39] Melzack and Casey's 1968 picture of the dimensions of pain is as influential today as ever, firmly framing theory and guiding research in the functional neuroanatomy and psychology of pain.

Evolutionary and behavioral role

Pain is part of the body's defense system, producing a reflexive retraction from the painful stimulus, and tendencies to protect the affected body part while it heals, and avoid that harmful situation in the future.[3][40] It is an important part of animal life, vital to healthy survival. People with congenital insensitivity to pain have reduced life expectancy.[41] Idiopathic pain (pain that persists after the trauma or pathology has healed, or that arises without any apparent cause), may be an exception to the idea that pain is helpful to survival, although John Sarno argues that such pain is psychogenic, enlisted as a protective distraction to keep dangerous emotions unconscious.[42] It is not clear what the survival benefit of some extreme forms of pain (e.g. toothache) might be, and the intensity of some forms of pain (for example as a result of injury to fingernails or toenails) seems to be out of all proportion to any survival benefits.

Thresholds

Variations in pain threshold or in pain tolerance occur between individuals for various reasons including cultural background, ethnicity, genetics, and gender. In pain science, thresholds are measured by gradually increasing the intensity of a stimulus such as electric current or heat applied to the body. The "pain perception threshold" is the point at which the stimulus begins to hurt, and the "tolerance threshold" is reached when the subject acts to stop the pain. There is significant variation in pain perception and tolerance thresholds between cultural groups. For example, people of Mediterranean origin report as painful certain radiant heat intensities that northern Europeans describe as warmth, and Italian women tolerate less electric shock than Jewish or Native American women. Some individuals in all cultures have considerably higher than normal pain perception and tolerance thresholds. For instance, patients who experience painless heart attacks have significantly higher pain thresholds for electric shock, heat and arm-muscle cramp than those who experience painful heart attacks.[43]

Diagnosis

A person's self report is the most reliable measure of pain, with health care professionals tending to underestimate severity.[44] A definition of pain widely employed in nursing, emphasizing its subjective nature and the importance of believing patient reports, was introduced by Margo McCaffery in 1968: "Pain is whatever the experiencing person says it is, existing whenever he says it does".[45] To assess intensity, the patient may be asked to locate their pain on a scale of 0 to 10, with 0 being no pain at all, and 10 the worst pain they have ever felt. Quality can be established by having the patient complete the McGill Pain Questionnaire indicating which words best describe their pain.[7]

Multidimensional pain inventory

The Multidimensional Pain Inventory (MPI) is a questionnaire designed to assess the psychosocial state of a person with chronic pain. Analysis of MPI results by Turk and Rudy (1988) found three classes of chronic pain patient: "(a) dysfunctional, people who perceived the severity of their pain to be high, reported that pain interfered with much of their lives, reported a higher degree of psychological distress caused by pain, and reported low levels of activity; (b) interpersonally distressed, people with a common perception that significant others were not very supportive of their pain problems; and (c) adaptive copers, patients who reported high levels of social support, relatively low levels of pain and perceived interference, and relatively high levels of activity."[46] Combining the MPI characterization of the person with their IASP multiaxial pain profile is recommended for deriving the most useful case description.[14]

Assessment in nonverbal patients

See also: Pain and dementia and Pain in babies

When a person is non-verbal and cannot self report pain, observation becomes critical, and specific behaviors can be monitored as pain indicators. Behaviors such as facial grimacing and guarding indicate pain, as well as an increase or decrease in vocalizations, changes in routine behavior patterns and mental status changes. Patients experiencing pain may exhibit withdrawn social behavior and possibly experience a decreased appetite and decreased nutritional intake. A change in condition that deviates from baseline such as moaning with movement or when manipulating a body part, and limited range of motion are also potential pain indicators. In patients who possess language but are incapable of expressing themselves effectively, such as those with dementia, an increase in confusion or display of aggressive behaviors, including agitation, may signal that discomfort exists, and further assessment is necessary.

Infants feel pain but they lack the language needed to report it, so communicate distress by crying. A non-verbal pain assessment should be conducted involving the parents, who will notice changes in the infant not obvious to the health care provider. Pre-term babies are more sensitive to painful stimuli than full term babies.[47]

Other barriers to reporting

An aging adult may not respond to pain in the way that a younger person would. Their ability to recognize pain may be blunted by illness or the use of multiple prescription drugs. Depression may also keep the older adult from reporting they are in pain. The older adult may also quit doing activities they love because it hurts too much. Decline in self-care activities (dressing, grooming, walking, etc.) may also be indicators that the older adult is experiencing pain. The older adult may refrain from reporting pain because they are afraid they will have to have surgery or will be put on a drug they become addicted to. They may not want others to see them as weak, or may feel there is something impolite or shameful in complaining about pain, or they may feel the pain is deserved punishment for past transgressions.[48]

Cultural barriers can also keep a person from telling someone they are in pain. Religious beliefs may prevent the individual from seeking help. They may feel certain pain treatment is against their religion. They may not report pain because they feel it is a sign that death is near. Many people fear the stigma of addiction and avoid pain treatment so as not to be prescribed addicting drugs. Many Asians do not want to lose respect in society by admitting they are in pain and need help, believing the pain should be borne in silence, while other cultures feel they should report pain right away and get immediate relief.[47] Gender can also be a factor in reporting pain. Gender differences are usually the result of social and cultural expectations, with women expected to be emotional and show pain and men stoic, keeping pain to themselves.[47]

As an aid to diagnosis

Pain is a symptom of many medical conditions. Knowing the time of onset, location, intensity, pattern of occurrence (continuous, intermittent, etc.), exacerbating and relieving factors, and quality (burning, sharp, etc.) of the pain will help the examining physician to accurately diagnose the problem. For example, chest pain described as extreme heaviness may indicate myocardial infarction, while chest pain described as tearing may indicate aortic dissection.[49][50]

Management

Medicine

Acute pain is usually managed by one practitioner with medications such as analgesics and anesthetics. Management of chronic pain, however, is much more difficult and may require the coordinated efforts of a pain management team, which typically includes medical practitioners, clinical psychologists, physiotherapists, occupational therapists, and nurse practitioners.[51][52]

Inadequate treatment of pain is widespread throughout surgical wards, intensive care units, accident and emergency departments, in general practice, in the management of all forms of chronic pain including cancer pain, and in end of life care.[53] This neglect is extended to all ages, from neonates to the frail elderly.[54][55][56] African and Hispanic Americans are more likely to suffer needlessly in the hands of a physician than whites;[57][58] and women's pain is more likely to be undertreated than men's.[59]

The International Association for the Study of Pain advocates that the relief of pain should be recognized as a human right, that chronic pain should be considered a disease in its own right, and that pain medicine should have the full status of a specialty.[60] It is a specialty only in China and Australia at this time.[61] Elsewhere, pain medicine is a subspecialty under disciplines such as anesthesiology, physiatry, neurology, palliative medicine and psychiatry.[62]

Placebo

Suggestion can significantly affect pain intensity. About 35% of people report marked relief after receiving a saline injection they believe to have been morphine. The placebo effect is more pronounced in people who are anxious. Anxiety reduction may, therefore, account for some of the effect. Placebos are more effective on intense pain than mild pain; and they produce progressively weaker effects with repeated administration.[63]

Social support

Individuals with more social support experience less cancer pain, take less pain medication, are less likely to suffer from chest pain after coronary artery bypass surgery, report less labor pain and are less likely to use epidural anesthesia during childbirth.[64]

Distraction

It is possible for many chronic pain sufferers to become so absorbed in an activity or entertainment that the pain is no longer felt, or is greatly diminished.[65]

Children

Sweet solution has been shown to be effective in reducing pain from immunization in children between one and twelve months of age.[66] But, at least for the newborn, a recent study monitored nerve activity in the pain centres of babies’ brains and found that sugar merely has the effect of altering babies’ facial expressions, giving the impression they are feeling less pain.[67]

Alternative medicine

Pain is the most common reason that people use complementary and alternative medicine.[68][69] An analysis of the 13 highest quality studies of pain treatment with acupuncture, published in January 2009 in the British Medical Journal, concluded there is little difference in the effect of real, sham and no acupuncture.[70] There is interest in the relationship between vitamin D and pain, but the evidence so far from controlled trials for such a relationship, other than in osteomalacia, is unconvincing.[71] A 2007 review of 13 studies found evidence for the efficacy of hypnosis in the reduction of pain in some conditions, though the number of patients enrolled in the studies was low, bringing up issues of power to detect group differences, and most lacked credible controls for placebo and/or expectation. The authors concluded that "although the findings provide support for the general applicability of hypnosis in the treatment of chronic pain, considerably more research will be needed to fully determine the effects of hypnosis for different chronic-pain conditions." (p. 283)[72]

Epidemiology

Pain is the main reason for visiting the emergency department in more than 50% of cases[73] and is present in 30% of family practice visits.[74] Chronic pain is believed to affect 12-80% of the population.[75]

Society and culture

The okipa ceremony as witnessed by George Catlin, circa 1835.

The nature or meaning of physical pain has been diversely understood by religious or secular traditions from antiquity to modern times.[76][77]

Physical pain is an important political topic in relation to various issues, including pain management policy, drug control, animal rights, torture, pain compliance. In various contexts, the deliberate infliction of pain in the form of corporal punishment is used as retribution for an offence, or for the purpose of disciplining or reforming a wrongdoer, or to deter attitudes or behaviour deemed unacceptable. In some cultures, extreme practices such as mortification of the flesh or painful rites of passage are highly regarded.

Philosophy of pain is a branch of philosophy of mind that deals essentially with physical pain. Identity theorists assert that the mental state of pain is completely identical with some physiological state. Functionalists consider that pain as a mental state is constituted solely by its functional role, by its causal relations to other mental states, sensory inputs, and behavioral outputs.

More generally, it is often as a part of pain in the broad sense, i.e., suffering, that physical pain is dealt with in culture, religion, philosophy, or society.

In other animals

Portrait of René Descartes by Jan Baptist Weenix 1647-1649

The most reliable method for assessing pain in most humans is by asking a question: a person may report pain that cannot be detected by any known physiological measure. However, like infants (Latin infans meaning "unable to speak"), non-human animals cannot answer questions about whether they feel pain; thus the defining criterion for pain in humans cannot be applied to them. Philosophers and scientists have responded to this difficulty in a variety of ways. René Descartes for example argued that animals lack consciousness and therefore do not experience pain and suffering in the way that humans do.[78][79] Bernard Rollin of Colorado State University, the principal author of two U.S. federal laws regulating pain relief for animals,[80] writes that researchers remained unsure into the 1980s as to whether animals experience pain, and that veterinarians trained in the U.S. before 1989 were simply taught to ignore animal pain.[81] In his interactions with scientists and other veterinarians, he was regularly asked to "prove" that animals are conscious, and to provide "scientifically acceptable" grounds for claiming that they feel pain.[81] Carbone writes that the view that animals feel pain differently is now a minority view. Academic reviews of the topic are more equivocal, noting that although the argument that animals have at least simple conscious thoughts and feelings has strong support,[82] some critics continue to question how reliably animal mental states can be determined.[79][83] The ability of invertebrate species of animals, such as insects, to feel pain and suffering is also unclear.[84][85]

The presence of pain in an animal cannot be known for certain, but it can be inferred through physical and behavioral reactions.[86] Specialists currently believe that all vertebrates can feel pain, and that certain invertebrates, like the octopus, might too.[87][88] As for other animals, plants, or other entities, their ability to feel physical pain is at present a question beyond scientific reach, since no mechanism is known by which they could have such a feeling. In particular, there are no known nociceptors in groups such as plants, fungi, and most insects,[89] except for instance in fruit flies.[90]

In vertebrates, endogenous opioids are neurochemicals that moderate pain by interacting with opiate receptors. Opioids and opiate receptors occur naturally in crustaceans and, although at present no certain conclusion can be drawn,[91] their presence indicates that lobsters may be able to experience pain.[91][92] Opioids may mediate their pain in the same way as in vertebrates.[92] Veterinary medicine uses, for actual or potential animal pain, the same analgesics and anesthetics as used in humans.[93]

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 "IASP definition, full entry". Retrieved 6 October 2009. This often quoted definition was first formulated by an IASP Subcommittee on Taxonomy [Bonica, JJ (1979). "The need of a taxonomy". Pain 6 (3): 247–252. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(79)90046-0. ISSN 0304-3959. PMID 460931] It is derived from Harold Merskey's 1964 definition: "An unpleasant experience that we primarily associate with tissue damage or describe in terms of tissue damage or both." [Merskey, H (1964). An Investigation of pain in psychological illness, DM Thesis. Oxford University. Archived on May 12, 2008. Error: If you specify |archiveurl=, you must first specify |url=. http://web.archive.org/web/20080512061229/http%3A//www.iasp-pain.org/AM/Template.cfm%3FSection%3DGeneral_Resource_Links%26Template%3D/CM/HTMLDisplay.cfm%26ContentID%3D3058#Pain. ]
  2. The examples represent respectively the three classes of nociceptive pain - mechanical, thermal and chemical - and neuropathic pain.
  3. 3.0 3.1 Lynn, B (1984) "Cutaneous nociceptors" in Holden, AV & Winlow, W The neurobiology of pain. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press. p. 106. ISBN 0-7190-0996-0.
  4. Woolf, CJ & Mannion, RJ (1999) "Neuropathic pain: aetiology, symptoms, mechanisms and management". The Lancet 353 (9168): 1959–1064. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(99)01307-0. PMID 10371588.
  5. Raj, PP (2007) "Taxonomy and classification of pain" in Kreitler, S; Beltrutti, D; Lamberto, A et al. The handbook of chronic pain. New York: Nova Science Publishers Inc. ISBN 1-60021-044-9
  6. Turk, DC & Dworkin, RH (2004) "What should be the core outcomes in chronic pain clinical trials?" Arthritis Research & Therapy 6 (4): 151–154. doi:10.1186/ar1196. PMID 15225358.
  7. 7.0 7.1 Breivik, H; Borchgrevink, PC; Allen, SM; Rosseland, LA; Romundstad, L; Hals, EK; Kvarstein, G; Stubhaug, A (2008). "Assessment of pain". British journal of anaesthesia 101 (1): 17–24. doi:10.1093/bja/aen103. PMID 18487245.
  8. Eisenberger, NI; Lieberman, M (2005) "Why it hurts to be left out: The neurocognitive overlap between physical and social pain" in Williams, KD; Forgas, JP; von Hippel, W, The Social Outcast: Ostracism, Social Exclusion, Rejection, and Bullying. New York: Cambridge University Press. pp. 109–127. See page 120.
  9. 9.0 9.1 Melzack, R; Casey, KL (1968). "Sensory, motivational and central control determinants of chronic pain: A new conceptual model". in Kenshalo, DR. The Skin Senses. Springfield, Illinois: Thomas. p. 432.
  10. poena, Charlton T. Lewis, Charles Short, A Latin Dictionary, on Perseus Digital Library
  11. ποινή, Henry George Liddell, Robert Scott, A Greek-English Lexicon, on Perseus Digital Library
  12. Raj, PP (2007). "Taxonomy and classification of pain". In Kreitler, S; Beltrutti, D; Lamberto, A et al.. The handbook of chronic pain. New York: Nova Science Publishers Inc.. ISBN 1-60021-044-9. http://books.google.com.au/books?id=ZG4Svh_UL3UC&pg=PA45&lpg=PA45&dq=%22table+2.the+iasp+five-pain+taxonomy:+overview%22&source=bl&ots=3fQ0etWRRD&sig=a85HCYk5ah7Woo2DOjGBmwnsdNQ&hl=en&ei=WN42S8uVJMqLkAW8w4T2CA&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CAgQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=%22table%202.the%20iasp%20five-pain%20taxonomy%3A%20overview%22&f=true. 
  13. Woolf, CJ, CJ; Bennett, G; Doherty, M; Dubner, R; Kidd, B; Koltzenburg, M; Lipton, R; Loeser, JD et al. (1998). "Towards a mechanism-based classification of pain?". Pain 77 (3): 227–229. doi:10.1016/S0304-3959(98)00099-2. PMID 9808347. http://download.journals.elsevierhealth.com/pdfs/journals/0304-3959/PIIS0304395998000992.pdf. 
  14. 14.0 14.1 14.2 14.3 14.4 14.5 Turk, DC; Okifuji, A (2001). "Pain terms and taxonomies of pain". In Loeser, JD; Bonica, JJ. Bonica's management of pain (third ed.). Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. ISBN 0683304623. 
  15. Main, CJ; Spanswick, CC (2001). Pain management: an interdisciplinary approach. Elsevier. p. 93. ISBN 0-443-05683-8. http://books.google.com/?id=wcEQPzTOEAoC&pg=PA93&dq=chronic+acute+subacute+pain&cd=48#v=onepage&q=chronic%20acute%20subacute%20pain. 
  16. 16.0 16.1 Thienhaus, O; Cole, BE (2002). "Classification of pain". In Weiner, RS. Pain management: A practical guide for clinicians (sixth ed.). American Academy of Pain Management. p. 28. ISBN 0-8493-0926-3. http://books.google.com.au/books?id=lg7sIgP9D3kC&pg=PA28&dq=%22classification+by+time+course%22&lr=&client=firefox-a&cd=1#v=onepage&q=%22classification%20by%20time%20course%22&f=true. 
  17. Keay, KA; Clement, CI; Bandler, R (2000). "The neuroanatomy of cardiac nociceptive pathways". In Horst, GJT. The nervous system and the heart. Totowa, New Jersey: Humana Press. p. 304. ISBN 089603. http://books.google.com.au/books?id=IeElgT1clUcC&pg=PA303&lpg=PA303&dq=%22definitions+of+pain+and+its+central+representation%22&source=bl&ots=mKVpvW_2gA&sig=gs3Z5lQMiMHg2tT7Fc1D2RSzbHI&hl=en&ei=DlpAS83FE8uHkQWOnon1Bg&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CAoQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=%22definitions%20of%20pain%20and%20its%20central%20representation%22&f=true. 
  18. Coda, BA; Bonica, JJ (2001). "General considerations of acute pain". In Loeser, D; Bonica, JJ. Bonica's management of pain (3 ed.). Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. ISBN 0443056838. 
  19. Bogduk, N; Merskey, H (1994). Classification of chronic pain: descriptions of chronic pain syndromes and definitions of pain terms (second ed.). Seattle: IASP Press. p. 212. ISBN 0931092051. 
  20. Paice, JA (Jul-Aug 2003). "Mechanisms and management of neuropathic pain in cancer". Journal of supportive oncology 1 (2): 107–20. PMID 15352654. http://www.supportiveoncology.net/journal/articles/0102107.pdf. 
  21. 21.0 21.1 Cleveland Clinic, Health information
  22. "Psychogenic pain - definition from Biology-Online.org". Biology-online.org. http://www.biology-online.org/dictionary/Psychogenic_pain. Retrieved 2008-11-05. 
  23. "IASP definition, full entry". Archived from the original on May 12, 2008. http://web.archive.org/web/20080512061229/http%3A//www.iasp-pain.org/AM/Template.cfm%3FSection%3DGeneral_Resource_Links%26Template%3D/CM/HTMLDisplay.cfm%26ContentID%3D3058#Pain. Retrieved 6 October 2009. : "Many people report pain in the absence of tissue damage or any likely pathophysiological cause; usually this happens for psychological reasons. There is usually no way to distinguish their experience from that due to tissue damage if we take the subjective report. If they regard their experience as pain and if they report it in the same ways as pain caused by tissue damage, it should be accepted as pain."
  24. 24.0 24.1 Melzack, R; Wall, PD (1996). The challenge of pain (2 ed.). London: Penguin. pp. 31–32. ISBN 4780140256703. 
  25. Jensen, TS; Krebs, B; Nielsen, J; Rasmussen, P (March 1983). "Phantom limb, phantom pain and stump pain in amputees during the first six months following limb amputation". Pain 17 (3): 243–56. doi:10.1016/0304-3959(83)90097-0. PMID 6657285. http://download.journals.elsevierhealth.com/pdfs/journals/0304-3959/PII0304395983900970.pdf. 
    Jensen, TS; Krebs, B; Nielsen, J; Rasmussen, P (March 1985). "Immediate and long-term phantom limb pain in amputees: Incidence, clinical characteristics and relationship to pre-amputation limb pain". Pain 21 (3): 267–78. doi:10.1016/0304-3959(85)90090-9. PMID 3991231. http://download.journals.elsevierhealth.com/pdfs/journals/0304-3959/PII0304395985900909.pdf. 
  26. 26.0 26.1 26.2 Melzack, R; Wall, PD (1996). The challenge of pain (2 ed.). London: Penguin. pp. 61–69. ISBN 4780140256703. 
  27. Nikola Grahek, Feeling pain and being in pain, Oldenburg, 2001. ISBN 3-8142-0780-7.
  28. Beecher, HK (1959). Measurement of subjective responses. New York: Oxford University Press.  cited in Melzack, R; Wall, PD (1996). The challenge of pain (2 ed.). London: Penguin. p. 7. ISBN 4780140256703. 
  29. Brand, P; Yancey, P (1997). The gift of pain: why we hurt & what we can do about it. Zondervan Publ.. ISBN 0-310-22144-7. 
  30. Hart, RP; Wade, JB; Martelli, MF (April 2003). "Cognitive impairment in patients with chronic pain: the significance of stress". Current Pain Headache Rep 7 (2): 116–126. PMID 12628053. 
  31. 31.0 31.1 31.2 Melzack, R; Katz, J (2003). "The Gate Control Theory: Reaching for the Brain". In Hadjistavropoulos, T; Craig, KD. Pain: Psychological Perspectives. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. ISBN 0-8058-4299-3. 
  32. Todd, EM; Kucharski, A (2004). "Pain: Historical Perspectives". In Warfield, CA; Bajwa, ZH. Principles and Practice of Pain Medicine (2 ed.). McGraw Hill. ISBN 0-07-144349-5. http://books.google.com.au/books?id=B4TY82NLR6sC&pg=PP1&dq=Principles+and+practice+of+pain+medicine#v=onepage&q=&f=false. 
  33. Melzack, R; Wall. PD (Nov 196519). "Pain mechanisms: a new theory". Science 150 (699): 971–979. doi:10.1126/science.150.3699.971. PMID 5320816. 
  34. 34.0 34.1 34.2 Woolf, CJ (2007). "Deconstructing pain: A deterministic dissection of the molecular basis of pain". In Coakley, S; Kaufman Shelemay, K. Pain and its transformations: the interface of biology and culture. Harvard University Press. p. 3. ISBN 0-673-02456-7. http://books.google.com/?id=sQULdfIlBIYC&pg=PA31&dq=%22Recordings+from+individual+sensory%22&q=%22Recordings%20from%20individual%20sensory%22. 
  35. 35.0 35.1 Craig, AD (Bud) (2003). "Pain mechanisms: Labeled lines versus convergence in central processing". Annual review of neuroscience 26: 1–30. doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.26.041002.131022. PMID 12651967. 
  36. Craig, AD; Krout, K; Andrew, D (2001). "Quantitative response characteristics of thermoreceptive and nociceptive lamina I spinothalamic neurons in the cat". Journal of neurophysiology 86 (3): 1459–80. PMID 11535691. 
  37. Romanelli P, Esposito V (2004). "The functional anatomy of neuropathic pain". Neurosurgery clinics of North America 15 (3): 257–68. doi:10.1016/j.nec.2004.02.010. PMID 15246335. 
  38. Vanderah TW (2007). "Pathophysiology of pain". Medical clinics of North America 91 (1): 1–12. doi:10.1016/j.mcna.2006.10.006. PMID 17164100. 
  39. Inui, K; Tsuji, T; Kakigi, R (2006). "Temporal analysis of cortical mechanisms for pain relief by tactile stimuli in humans". Cerebral Cortex 16 (3): 355–365. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhi114. PMID 15901650. http://cercor.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/reprint/16/3/355. 
  40. Bernston, GG; Cacioppo, JT (2008). "The neuroevolution of motivation". In Shah, JY; Gardner, WL. Handbook of motivation science. New York: Guildford Press. p. 191. ISBN 1593855680. http://books.google.com.au/books?id=iCxpZkZtDG8C&pg=PT209&dq=%22One+general+class+of+spinal+reflexes+consists+of+the+flexor+(pain)+withdrawal%22&client=firefox-a&cd=1#v=onepage&q=%22One%20general%20class%20of%20spinal%20reflexes%20consists%20of%20the%20flexor%20(pain)%20withdrawal%22&f=true. 
  41. Nagasako, EM; Oaklander, AL; Dworkin, RH (Feb 2003). "Congenital insensitivity to pain: an update". Pain 101 (3): 213–9. doi:10.1016/S0304-3959(02)00482-7. PMID 12583863. http://download.journals.elsevierhealth.com/pdfs/journals/0304-3959/PIIS0304395902004827.pdf. 
  42. Sarno, John E., MD, et al., The Divided Mind: The Epidemic of Mindbody Disorders 2006 (ISBN 0-06-085178-3)
  43. Melzack, R; Wall, PD (1996). The challenge of pain (2 ed.). London: Penguin. pp. 17–19. ISBN 4780140256703. 
  44. Prkachin, KM; Solomon, PE; Ross, J. (June 2007). "Underestimation of pain by health-care providers: towards a model of the process of inferring pain in others". Canadian journal of nursing research 39 (2): 88–106. PMID 17679587. 
  45. McCaffery M. (1968). Nursing practice theories related to cognition, bodily pain, and man-environment interactions. LosAngeles: UCLA Students Store.
    More recently, McCaffery defined pain as "whatever the experiencing person says it is, existing whenever the experiencing person says it does.” Pasero, Chris; McCaffery, Margo (1999). Pain: clinical manual. St. Louis: Mosby. ISBN 0-8151-5609-X. 
  46. Turk, DC; Rudy, TE (1988). "Toward an empirically derived taxonomy of chronic pain patients: integration of psychological assessment data". Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 56 (2): 233–8. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.56.2.233. PMID 3372831. 
  47. 47.0 47.1 47.2 Jarvis C (2004). Physical Examination and Health Assessment (fifth ed.). Canada: Saunders Elsevier. pp. 180–192. 
  48. lawhorne, L; Passerini, J (1999). Chronic Pain Management in the Long Term Care Setting: Clinical Practice Guidelines. Baltimore, Maryland: American Medical Directors Association. pp. 1–27. 
  49. Panju, AA; Hemmelgarn, BR; Guyatt, GH; Simel, DL (1998). "The rational clinical examination. Is this patient having a myocardial infarction?". Journal of the American Medical Association 280 (14): 1256–63. PMID 9786377. 
  50. Slater, E; DeSanctis, RW (1976). "The clinical recognition of dissecting aortic aneurysm". The American Journal of Medicine 60 (5): 625–33. doi:10.1016/0002-9343(76)90496-4. PMID 1020750. 
  51. Thienhaus, O; Cole, BE (2002). "The classification of pain". In Weiner, RS. Pain management: A practical guide for clinicians. American Academy of Pain Management. p. 29. ISBN 0 8493 0926 3. http://books.google.com/?id=lg7sIgP9D3kC&pg=PA28&dq=chronic+acute+subacute+pain+idiopathic&cd=1#v=snippet&q=%22acute%20pain%20is%20reasonably%20managed%20and%20usually%20resolves%20with%20the%20efforts%20of%20a%20single%20practitioner%22. 
  52. Main, Chris J.; Spanswick, Chris C. (2000). Pain management: an interdisciplinary approach. Churchill Livingstone. ISBN 0 443 05683 8. http://books.google.com.au/books?id=wcEQPzTOEAoC&printsec=frontcover&dq=Pain+management:+an+interdisciplinary+approach&client=firefox-a&cd=1#v=onepage&q=&f=true. 
    • Main, Chris J.; Spanswick, Chris C. (2000). Pain management: an interdisciplinary approach. Churchill Livingstone. ISBN 0 443 05683 8.
    • Brown, AK; Christo, PJ; Wu, CL (2004). "Strategies for postoperative pain management". Best practice & research: Clinical anaesthesiology 18 (4): 703–17. doi:10.1016/j.bpa.2004.05.004. PMID 15460554.
    • Cullen, L; Titler, MG; Titler, MG (2001). "Pain management in the culture of critical care". Critical care nursing clinics of North America 13 (2): 151–66. PMID 11866399.
    • Rupp, T; Delaney, KA (2004). "Inadequate analgesia in emergency medicine". Annals of emergency medicine 43 (4): 504–6. doi:10.1016/ j.annemergmed.2003.11.019 PMID 15039693.
    • Smith, GF; Toonen, TR (2007). "Primary care of the patient with cancer". American family physician 75 (8): 1207–14. PMID 17477104.
    • Jacobson, PL; Mann, JD (2003). "Evolving role of the neurologist in the diagnosis and treatment of chronic noncancer pain". Mayo Clinic proceedings 78 (1): 80–4. doi:10.4065/​78.1.80 PMID 12528880.
    • Deandrea, S; Montanari, M; Moja, L; Apolone, G (2008). "Prevalence of undertreatment in cancer pain: A review of published literature". Annals of oncology 19 (12): 1985–91. doi:10.1093/annonc/mdn419. PMID 18632721.
    • Okuyama, T; Wang, XS; Akechi, T et al (2004). "Adequacy of cancer pain management in a japanese cancer hospital". Japanese journal of clinical oncology 34 (1): 37–42. doi:10.1093/jjco/hyh004. PMID 15020661.
    • Perron, V; Schonwetter, RS (2001). "Assessment and management of pain in palliative care patients". Cancer Control 8 (1): 15–24. PMID 11176032.
  53. Selbst, SM; Fein, JA (2006). "Sedation and analgesia". In Fleisher, GR; Ludwig, S; Henretig, FM. Textbook of pediatric emergency medicine (5 ed.). Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. p. 63. ISBN 0781750741. http://books.google.com.au/books?id=oA7qSOvYZxUC&pg=PA63&lpg=PA63&dq=%22historical+undertreatment+of+pain+in+the+emergency+department&source=bl&ots=PcadcOHp4D&sig=miBGCZKKV6Sf3xdvktZW9m_e3Oo&hl=en&ei=5mxES_SFK4r-6QP_jbWXCg&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CAgQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=&f=true. 
  54. Taylor, BJ; Robbins, JM; Gold, JI et al.; Logsdon, T. R.; Bird, T. M.; Anand, K. J. S. (2006). "Assessing postoperative pain in neonates: A multicenter observational study". Pediatrics 118 (4): e992–e1000. doi:10.1542/peds.2005-3203. PMID 17015519. 
  55. Cleeland, CS (1998). "Undertreatment of cancer pain in elderly patients". Journal of the American Medical Association 279 (23): 1914–5. doi:10.1001/jama.279.23.1914. PMID 9634265. 
  56. Bonham, VL (2001). "Race, ethnicity, and pain treatment: Striving to understand the causes and solutions to the disparities in pain treatment". Journal of law, medicine & ethics, 29: 52–68
  57. Green, GR; Anderson, KO; Baker, TA et al; Campbell, Lisa C.; Decker, Sheila; Fillingim, Roger B.; Kaloukalani, Donna A.; Lasch, Kathyrn E. et al. (2003). "The unequal burden of pain: Confronting racial and ethnic disparities in pain". Pain medicine 4 (3): 277–94. doi:10.1046/j.1526-4637.2003.03034.x. PMID 12974827. http://www.med.umich.edu/opm/newspage/2003/Sept%2003%20paper.pdf. 
  58. Hoffmann, DE; Tarzian, AJ (2001). "The Girl Who Cried Pain: A Bias Against Women in the Treatment of Pain". Journal of law, medicine & ethics 29 (1): 13–27. PMID 11521267. http://www.painandthelaw.org/aslme_content/29-1/hoffmann.pdf. 
  59. "International Association for the Study of Pain | IASP International Pain Summit", accessed 7 September 2010
  60. Horlocker, Terese T.; Cousins, Michael J.; Bridenbaugh, Phillip O.; Carr, Daniel L. (2008). Cousins and Bridenbaugh's Neural Blockade in Clinical Anesthesia and Pain Medicine. Hagerstwon, MD: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. ISBN 0-7817-7388-1. http://books.google.ca/books?id=vEXJwhPSYpoC&pg=PA639&lpg=PA639&dq=cousins+neural+blockade+china+australia+pain+specialty&source=bl&ots=HBhGMN490n&sig=rp3ZQsyl-VDecDKgc2xy0IZQDPo&hl=en&ei=AomFTPLCLoa8lQfA5dD6Dg&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CBcQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q&f=false. 
  61. "About physician specialties". American Board of Medical Specialties. http://www.abms.org/Who_We_Help/Consumers/About_Physician_Specialties/physical.aspx. Retrieved 12 January 2010. 
  62. Melzack, R; Wall, PD (1996). The challenge of pain (2 ed.). London: Penguin. pp. 26–28. ISBN 4780140256703. 
  63. Eisenberger, NI; Lieberman (2005). "Why it hurts to be left out: The neurocognitive overlap between physical and social pain". In Williams, KD; Forgas, JP; von Hippel, W. The social outcast: Ostracism, social exclusion, rejection, and bullying. New York: Cambridge University Press. pp. 109–127. ISBN 184169424X. http://webscript.princeton.edu/%7Epsych/psychology/related/socneuconf/pdf/eisenberger-lieberman2.pdf. 
  64. Melzack, R; Wall, PD (1996). The challenge of pain (2 ed.). London: Penguin. pp. 22–23. ISBN 4780140256703. 
  65. Harrison D, Stevens B, Bueno M, et al. (June 2010). "Efficacy of sweet solutions for analgesia in infants between 1 and 12 months of age: a systematic review". Arch. Dis. Child. 95 (6): 406–13. doi:10.1136/adc.2009.174227. PMID 20463370. 
  66. http://www.nursingtimes.net/whats-new-in-nursing/primary-care/infant-pain-unaffected-by-sugar/5018876.article
  67. Astin, JA (20 May 1998). "Why patients use alternative medicine: Results of a national study". Journal of the American Medical Association 279 (19): 1548–1553. doi:10.1001/jama.279.19.1548. PMID 9605899. 
  68. Eisenberg, DM; Kessler, RC; Foster, C; Norlock, FE; Calkins, DR; Delbanco, TL (28 Jan 1993). "Unconventional medicine in the United States. Prevalence, costs, and patterns of use". New England Journal of Medicine 328 (4): 246–52. doi:10.1056/NEJM199301283280406. PMID 8418405. 
  69. Madsen, MV; Gøtzsche, PC; Hróbjartsson, A (2009). "Acupuncture treatment for pain: systematic review of randomised clinical trials with acupuncture, placebo acupuncture, and no acupuncture groups". BMJ 338: a3115. doi:10.1136/bmj.a3115. PMID 19174438. PMC 2769056. http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/338/jan27_2/a3115. 
  70. Straube, S; Andrew Moore, R; Derry, S; McQuay, HJ (2009). "Vitamin D and chronic pain". Pain 141 (1): 10–13. doi:10.1016/j.pain.2008.11.010. ISSN 0304-3959. PMID 19084336. http://download.journals.elsevierhealth.com/pdfs/journals/0304-3959/PIIS0304395908007069.pdf. 
  71. Elkins, G; Jensen, MP; Jensen, DR; Patterson (2007). "Hypnotherapy for the management of chronic pain". International journal of clinical and experimental hypnosis 55 (3): 275–287. doi:10.1080/00207140701338621. PMID 17558718. 
  72. Cordell WH, Keene KK, Giles BK, Jones JB, Jones JH, Brizendine EJ (May 2002). "The high prevalence of pain in emergency medical care". Am J Emerg Med 20 (3): 165–9. doi:10.1053/ajem.2002.32643. PMID 11992334. 
  73. "Prevalence of pain in general practice". http://www.europeanjournalpain.com/article/S1090-3801%2802%2900025-3/abstract. 
  74. Abu-Saad Huijer H (2010). "Chronic pain: a review". J Med Liban 58 (1): 21–7. PMID 20358856. 
  75. Rey, R (1995). The history of pain. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. ISBN 0-674-39968-4. 
  76. Morris, DR (1991). The culture of pain. Berkeley: University of California Press. ISBN 0-520-08276-1. 
  77. Carbone, L (2004). What Animals Want: Expertise and Advocacy in Laboratory Animal Welfare Policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press. p. 149. ISBN 0195161963. 
  78. 79.0 79.1 Working party of the Nuffield Council on Bioethics (2005). The ethics of research involving animals. London: Nuffield Council on Bioethics. ISBN 1904384102. Archived from the original on June 25, 2008. http://web.archive.org/web/20080625033250/http%3A//www.nuffieldbioethics.org/fileLibrary/pdf/RIA_Report_FINAL-opt.pdf. Retrieved 12 January 2010. 
  79. Rollin drafted the 1985 Health Research Extension Act and an animal welfare amendment to the 1985 Food Security Act. See:
    Rollin, BE (2007). "Animal research: a moral science. Talking point on the use of animals in scientific research". EMBO reports 8 (6): 521–525. doi:10.1038/sj.embor.7400996. PMID 17545990. 
  80. 81.0 81.1 Rollin, B. (1989) The Unheeded Cry: Animal Consciousness, Animal Pain, and Science. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. xii, 117-118, cited in Carbone 2004, p. 150.
  81. Griffin DR, Speck GB (2004) "New evidence of animal consciousness" Anim. Cogn. volume 7 issue 1 pages=5–18 PMID 14658059
  82. Allen C (1998) Assessing animal cognition: ethological and philosophical perspectives J. Anim. Sci. volume 76 issue 1 pages 42–7 PMID 9464883
  83. Lockwood JA (1987) The Moral Standing of Insects and the Ethics of Extinction The Florida Entomologist, Volume 70, Number 1, pages 70–89
  84. DeGrazia D, Rowan A (1991) Pain, suffering, and anxiety in animals and humans Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics Volume 12, Number 3, pages 193–211
  85. Abbott FV, Franklin KB, Westbrook RF (January 1995). "The formalin test: scoring properties of the first and second phases of the pain response in rats". Pain 60 (1): 91–102. doi:10.1016/0304-3959(94)00095-V. ISSN 0304-3959. PMID 7715946. http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/0304-3959(94)00095-V. 
  86. "Do Invertebrates Feel Pain?", The Senate Standing Committee on Legal and Constitutional Affairs, The Parliament of Canada Web Site, accessed 11 June 2008.
  87. Smith, JA (1991). "A Question of Pain in Invertebrates". Institute for laboratory animal research journal 33 (1-2). http://dels.nas.edu/ilar_n/ilarjournal/33_1_2/V33_1_2Question.shtml. 
  88. C. H. Eisemann, W. K. Jorgensen, D. J. Merritt, M. J. Rice, B. W. Cribb, P. D. Webb and M. P. Zalucki (1984) Do insects feel pain? — A biological view. Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences 40: 1420-1423
  89. Tracey, J., W. Daniel, R. I. Wilson, G. Laurent, and S. Benzer. 2003. painless, a Drosophila gene essential for nociception. Cell 113: 261-273. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(03)00272-1
  90. 91.0 91.1 L. Sømme (2005). "Sentience and pain in invertebrates: Report to Norwegian Scientific Committee for Food Safety". Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Oslo. 
  91. 92.0 92.1 Cephalopods and decapod crustaceans: their capacity to experience pain and suffering. Advocates for Animals. 2005. http://www.advocatesforanimals.org.uk/pdf/crustreport.pdf. 
  92. Viñuela-Fernández I, Jones E, Welsh EM, Fleetwood-Walker SM (September 2007). "Pain mechanisms and their implication for the management of pain in farm and companion animals". Vet. J. 174 (2): 227–39. doi:10.1016/j.tvjl.2007.02.002. ISSN 1090-0233. PMID 17553712. http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1090-0233(07)00067-6. 

External links